Sign the Petition - What Oligarchy Means: Small Groups of Multi-Millionaires Funding Almost All SuperPACs | David Dayen

What Oligarchy Means: Small Groups of Multi-Millionaires Funding Almost All SuperPACs | David Dayen

occupyonline:

Forget the five people you meet in heaven, here are the five people running the US election system these days.

We know how the super PACs have come to dominate the presidential campaign, but a closer look at financial-disclosure numbers shows how just a tiny handful of billionaires are dominating those super PACs. An analysis of January’s campaign-disclosure filings reveals that 25 percent of all the money raised for the presidential race that month came from just five donors. That select group gave $19 million to various super PACs, often in support of more than one Republican candidate. Those numbers come from both The Washington Post and USA Today, though neither gives a complete list of those five top donors of 2012.

Ari Berman has us covered. The list includes Harold Simmons, who has given to Perry, Romney and Gingrich this year; Sheldon Adelson and his wife, who are keeping Gingrich on life support; and Santorum pals Foster Freiss and William Dore. Also in the mix is billionaire investor Peter Thiel, a Romney angel.

If you want to extend the circle out to, say, 200 people, a report from Demos shows that about that many have contributed 80% of all SuperPAC money. These are the SuperPACs that have been a major determining factor in the GOP primary, and which swung many Congressional elections in 2010. This equals .000063 of the electorate.

I respect the arguments that Citizens United didn’t cause this all by itself. We had a messed-up election system before that Supreme Court ruling. But there has unquestionably been a cultural shift in recent years, with far more outright purchases of elections, using massive numbers. I would argue that the rise follows the rise in political economy of a select few. As the 1% spends to write the laws, they gain more power and a certain invincibility. So they can use that power on elections with relative impunity. One hand washes the other.

(Source: theamericanbear)

link posted 3 months ago with 84 notes
  1. mens-sana-in-corpore-sano reblogged this from socialuprooting
  2. jjarichardson reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham
  3. occupyli reblogged this from silas216
  4. silas216 reblogged this from socialuprooting
  5. kaitskrzypczak reblogged this from enlighteningnews
  6. thedoublelifeofmm reblogged this from starsinhereyes
  7. dorkstranger reblogged this from starsinhereyes
  8. parkstepp reblogged this from starsinhereyes
  9. starsinhereyes reblogged this from guerrillanetwork
  10. darwinsminion reblogged this from questionall and added:
    I learned about oligarchies in elementary school, yet I never connected it to the present situation. Bravo.
  11. questionall reblogged this from enlighteningnews
  12. fralcon reblogged this from socialuprooting
  13. theocproject reblogged this from pieceinthepuzzlehumanity
  14. occupy-sandiego reblogged this from enlighteningnews
  15. wak3thefuckup reblogged this from socialuprooting
  16. keeping-sane reblogged this from socialuprooting
  17. emmydiocracy reblogged this from socialuprooting
  18. dmyheadphonesb reblogged this from mysticsoul
  19. paradoxicalparadigms reblogged this from pieceinthepuzzlehumanity
  20. mssophiedarling reblogged this from pieceinthepuzzlehumanity
  21. revolutionizingminds reblogged this from enlighteningnews
  22. queennubian reblogged this from hairtrending
  23. hairtrending reblogged this from lycanpedia
  24. lunaticprophet reblogged this from enlighteningnews
  25. pieceinthepuzzlehumanity reblogged this from glitchthemachine
Sign the Petition